Rectangles and Squares
We saw that one of the properties of a rectangle is that its opposite sides are parallel. Can this be chosen as a definition of a rectangle? In other words, is every quadrilateral that has opposite sides parallel and equal, a rectangle?
This is a Try This problem. The question asks whether 'opposite sides parallel and equal' is sufficient to define a rectangle.
Answer: NO — this condition alone is not sufficient to define a rectangle.
A parallelogram has opposite sides parallel and equal by definition, but a parallelogram need NOT have right angles.
For example, a rhombus (not a square) has all sides equal (so opposite sides equal) and opposite sides parallel, but its angles are not 90°.
More generally, any non-rectangular parallelogram has opposite sides parallel and equal, yet is not a rectangle.
Therefore, 'opposite sides parallel and equal' describes a PARALLELOGRAM, which is a broader set than rectangles.
A rectangle requires the additional condition that all angles are 90° (or equivalently, that the diagonals are equal).
Answer: No. A quadrilateral with opposite sides parallel and equal is a parallelogram, which need not be a rectangle. An additional condition (all angles = 90°, or diagonals equal) is needed to guarantee a rectangle.
